« "This one time, at blog camp" | Main | House Delays Debate on Education Abandonment Act »

Flags

images.jpgDean uses flags to make a point about theocracy, but he forgot one very familiar use of St. Andrew's cross.  I'd also point him to this discussion to see why I think this particular flag is relevant to his discussion, mostly because of this (if you follow the link, scroll to "Building the Moral and Political Foundation"):

The League of The South, reviled by hate groups such as the Southern Poverty Law Center, is working very hard for the same general goals as us. In chapter 9 of The Grey Book: Blueprint for Southern Independence, the LOS describes the necessity to rebuild a Christian culture in tandem with any efforts at political reform. Their current plan of action to focus on local communities and individual change was a line of reasoning ten years in development. At one point they advocated large scale education efforts but found that ultimately success will only be achieved by individuals, families and then communities returning to the will of God and forsaking the yoke of federal tyranny one by one.

The League of The South has some nifty aims:

Once The League of the South has made "The Community of the Southern People" a reality, then we can pursue our political objectives: a return to constitutional republicanism and true federalism, or if that should prove unattainable, secession.

Secession, or self-determination, is the ultimate right of free men; and in the spirit of our Founding and Confederate forefathers, we shall, if necessary, invoke that principle once again.

I see the tongue in cheek point Dean was trying to make - but forgive me for being a bit touchy on the subject of theocracy right now.

Posted on Thursday, April 28, 2005 at 09:16AM by Registered CommenterTim in , | Comments4 Comments
Share this: del.icio.us | Digg | Google | Ma.gnolia | Reddit | Stumble Upon | Technorati

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (4)

Peculiar, but hardly racist: "I find it increasingly interesting that Planned Parenthood was founded as a means to snuff out the African population in this country. Here's just one more foul move on their part."

Of course, I'm just going by what they say, and not... you know... making shit up out of nothing.
April 28, 2005 | Unregistered CommenterThe Black Republican
I'm never meant to imply that Christian Exodus is a racist organization. I just find it peculiar that they align themselves with the League of the South, which is, despite any flowery rhetoric, clearly a racist organization.
April 28, 2005 | Registered CommenterTim
Umm... while I can "clearly" see how you would think that, and "clearly" believe they are just as misguided as Christian Exodus, I can also "clearly" read:

http://leagueofthesouth.net/static/homepage/intro_articles/csa-flags.html

Misguided morons in denial? Definitely.

Racists? Undetermined.

How about trying not to prejudge someone based on the outward appearances, Tim? You do know we fought a war to prove that - and these people's ancestors LOST. Amazingly, they seem to have learned that part of the lesson better than you did, so how about we teach them the rest of the story - including how their misplaced loyalties continue to hurt people - but without the bigotry?
April 28, 2005 | Unregistered CommenterThe Black Republican
I'm working on a post to document the racist nature of the League of the South, but for now I'll simply leave it at this. Having grown up in South Carolina, I know enough of about my fellow white men to know when they're blowing smoke up my ass about "Southern culture, heritage and sovereignty."
April 28, 2005 | Registered CommenterTim

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.